Recent posts

Thanks for the link. I want to believe he's right!

The link I provided disputes it based on the states having seperate powers.

The question becomes how one best challenges termination based on this argument?

#84

Vaccine Coercion / Re: Constitutionally Inoculate...

Last post by gonzo - 26 Jul 21, 07:50:11

https://goodsauce.news/pellowe-talk-55/

The second half of this interview is with another law professor who does not agree that sect51 is relevant for states.

#85

Vaccine Coercion / Archiving Web Pages

Last post by Neo - 25 Jul 21, 09:16:34

As information on the web gets written then published ... then mysteriously re-written (make no mistake, I have witnessed this happening on a private forum too) it's handy to be able to archive good webpages on demand. This site does just that ...
https://archive.ph

And you can find the archived copy by searching for the original URL on this site, Here's an example...
https://archive.ph/https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/the-law/2021/07/constitutionally-inoculated-to-resist-coercion/

All the best.
Neo

#86

Vaccine Coercion / Re: Risk/Benefit of mandatory ...

Last post by Excogitatoris - 25 Jul 21, 08:50:24

I posted it to be shared and put some common sense perspective to the fear driven policies.

An experienced statistician and former governmental executive has done a similar analysis on the costs of lockdowns in the Netherlands: It costs 3 to 5 times more quality live-years than it saves. An excellent video about this is to be found via this LINK.
It is in Dutch though. (I asked them to put on English subtitles) It also goes into how it comes that this 'Utilism' principle is ignored due to the 'Rescue' principle.

#87

Vaccine Coercion / Re: The DELTA Scariant

Last post by Neo - 25 Jul 21, 08:48:43

Love it ... Brilliant!

#88

Vaccine Coercion / Constitutionally Inoculated to...

Last post by Neo - 25 Jul 21, 08:46:08

24th July 2021 Author: Dr Augusto Zimmermann is Professor and Head of Law at Sheridan Institute of Higher Education, and Professor of Law (Adjunct) at the University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney campus. Dr Zimmermann was chair and professor of constitutional law at Murdoch University from 2007 to 2017. He is also a former Law Reform Commissioner in WA (2012-2017) and President of the Western Australian Legal Theory Association (WALTA). https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/the-law/2021/07/constitutionally-inoculated-to-resist-coercion/

Article back-up

#89

Vaccine Coercion / Re: Risk/Benefit of mandatory ...

Last post by Neo - 25 Jul 21, 08:33:20

This document is pure genius!!... You should be very proud of yourself for putting this together.

Just confirming that this is the finished report (no further analysis to add) and that it's Ok to share this document around with like-minded people?

#90

Vaccine Coercion / Re: FairWork process for those...

Last post by gonzo - 23 Jul 21, 18:26:17

I've started emailing more lawyers. This is the email I'm sending out. I want bites at least. Any suggestions on how to improve this would be greatly appreciated. I do tend to repeat myself so if you find such, please let me know. I'm emailing law firms that probably charge 1000 an hour.. my hope is that I may get some free legal advice without paying a cent. Hints as to whether I'm on target, etc.

QuoteDear Sir/Madam,

I've recently been fired for refusing to sign a consent form which asked me to give "completely voluntary" consent to vaccines. It's my understanding that informed consent requires a voluntary decision free from coercive influence. I believe my right to free and informed consent has been violated and that such coercive measures make a mockery of what it means to give informed consent.

My employer referred to SA's emergency management act relating to aged care facilities. My employer is of the opinion that I failed to comply with a reasonable and lawful directive.

I have a problem with the concept of consent under clearly coercive forces. I've maintained that I don't believe it possible to give valid consent under the circumstances and therefore can't comply with the demand of my employer.

I'm curious as to whether such emergency directives are legally valid. Section 51 (xxiiiA) of the Australian Constitution forbids "any form of civil conscription" in respect to medical and dental services. Justice Kirby (Wong vs Commonwealth of Australia) states:

"However, the prohibition on "any form of civil conscription" is designed to protect patients from having the supply of "medical and dental services", otherwise than by private contract, forced upon them without their consent." (127)

"A rare constitutional guarantee: Because of its character as a guarantee or protection, both for the healthcare professionals identified and for the patients affected by the provision of their services, the exclusion of any form of "civil conscription" must be seen as one of the rare instances of an individual guarantee and protection spelt out in the Australian Constitution" (128)

If civil conscription extends to myself, the Constitution supersedes state directives.

I have issue with the implications of such demands in respect also to my privacy rights under the Privacy Act 1998. I also question the validity of such directives considering the Biosecurity Act.

I have limited time to launch a claim with FairWork. I wish to challenge my termination.

Regards,

Thomas Webb

Pages 1 ... 7 8 9 10